I knew Inherent Vice was going to be a big, sloppy movie. I just didn’t know how much.
And I didn’t know it was going to be awful, either.
Boy, was this a plodding film. The Paul Thomas Anderson-directed (and -written, based in the novel by Thomas Pynchon) story of a dope-addled P.I. out to uncover various uninteresting mysteries in 1970 California, Inherent Vice isn’t nearly as funny as it thinks it is. And it’s more pretentious, to boot. Plus, there’s the addition of some bland narration, which suggests that the film doesn’t trust its audience to make its own judgments.
That’s a problem. Good movies have faith in their viewers. They coax people along, encourage them. Bad movies hold their audiences at bay, alienate them. And that’s exactly how I felt while watching Inherent Vice.
Much of this movie should’ve ended up on the cutting-room floor; there are all kinds of little idiosyncratic bits that purportedly suggest character development but ultimately fail in providing solid context. What results is a tedious mess. Too bad, because it could’ve been so much better.
I like Pynchon, but I think Inherent Vice, as a movie, doesn’t succeed. There’s originality here, but it’s not enough to carry it. For such a tiresome picture, it feels strangely rushed. That’s just another reason not to like it. Oh, well.
Boogie Nights – loved it. Magnolia – hated it. With a passion.
There Will Be Blood – excellent movie.
From what I’ve heard about Inherent Vice I’d lump it in the same category as Magnolia. I’ll save myself the price of a ticket.
I’m glad of your comments about Magnolia–I heard it was pretty dreadful. So far, PTA’s output has been a mixed bag. Let’s hope his next project will be better.